Installation view and other photos from my graduation show from Valand School of Fine Arts 2003, in the student gallery Rotor. I had been drawing and drawing texts for two years full time. I wanted to fill the exhibition spaces with gray animated surfaces. There were about 10 large scale surfaces, approximately 200x150cm to 280x280cm. I used abstract drawing method and sometimes figurative with simplified self-portrait or landscape like formations and lots of text fragments. How about seven years later it may seem reckless, but I wanted to mix the intuitively present in the moment and my quest to find the meditative with my artistic work, which unfortunately I feel is extremely difficult. I tried probably also show some very determined. I believe that the result for an observer were both assertive and inviting. Both micro and macro in terms of detail, the big ideas and big words interspersed with non-essentials. Do not know what is what, or what really is the most important. I'm still (20101105) interested in using text as a matter in my work. I'm thinking about what a text statement in such a thing like a "journal" may mean X number of years after the sentences has been written. What I mean is that you can not write / describe how something really is / was. The truth will probably be missed. If I write "I started sleeping in my own bed the X October XXXX," so will I in X number of years probably will have forgotten all the true sequence surrounding this diary sentence and then I or whoever happens READ THROUGH THOROUGHLY this sense that I have died believing in my diary, but in reality it does not tell the accurate truth. In my drawings, I always try to write a fragmentary, that the level of truth and language accuracy should be reasonable, albeit linguistically impossible. Biggest worry is that it is time consuming and exhausting to increase the amount of text fragments and fragmentation of these.